The local paper in Norwich has published my opinion piece on the Amero case.
When I first read of the case, my reaction was how illogical it all sounded: A middle-aged, substitute female teacher accessing porn on a classroom computer, in front of her students on one particular day? It made no sense.
Then I read on to find out the forensic examination of the computer clearly showed this machine was an old, poorly maintained system, riddled with spyware, without adequate protections in place, and it all became clear. Amero is the victim, not the perpetrator.
They did edit it a bit and it’s actually an earlier draft of the final, but the major gist of the storey is there. You can read the editorial piece here.
There’s so much more emerging on this case. I will likely interview Julie Amero and the expert witness this weekend, so watch this space for more.